RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04178
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
An Amendment to Special Order AV-0080 be accomplished to
indicate that he was in Title 10 status during his attendance at
Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) for the period 1 October
2006 through 28 October 2007.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While attending in-residence UPT training from October
2006 through October 2007, Special Order A-V0080 was published
under the Authority of Title 32. However, the training should
have been recorded as Title 10.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard
(ANG) in the grade of major (0-4).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial. A1PS states at the time the
applicant attended UPT - the MAPPER system was in use by the ANG
to produce orders for formal training that only allowed Title
32 status. To address this conflict, school orders were
produced with a comment in the remarks section indicating that
the member was in Title l0 status. The applicant provided a
copy of his school order which does not include a remark
indicating that he was in Title 10 status.
The applicant does not appear to have exhausted all available
administrative remedies prior to petitioning the AFBCMR. He
should contact his local Force Support Squadron and request
assistance in reviewing his records to determine if an amendment
to Special Order AV-0080 and a subsequent correction to his
DD 214 are required. If corrections are required and an
amendment is published, he may submit a request for a
DD 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) through VPC-GR.
A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit B.
NGB/A1P concurs with NGB/A1PS.
A complete copy of the NGB/A1P evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 7 January 2015 for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force OPR and adopt
its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant
has not exhausted his administrative avenues for relief. We
advise the applicant to contact his local Force Support Squadron
and request assistance in reviewing his records to determine if
an amendment to Special Order AV-0080 and a subsequent
correction to his DD Form 214 are required. However, should
after exhausting his administrative avenue of relief, the
applicant feel he is still a victim of an error or injustice,
the applicant may resubmit his application to the Board for
consideration.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-04178 in Executive Session on 28 May 2015, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Although chaired the panel, in view of his unavailability,
has agreed to sign as Acting Panel Chair. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 October 2014, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 16 December 2014.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1P, not dated.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 January 2015.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02883
Any and or all ANG and Army records damaged by the Revocation of Flying Order action be corrected. During this time, he received a negative OPR from his AFR unit. He was never informed his Flying Order would be permanently revoked, in fact, he was told by his former ANG commander that his record would not be damaged in any way should he be unable to return to Oklahoma for continuation of T-37 training with only one day’s notice.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02191
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 1 Oct 10, he became eligible for ACP when he received his initial AGR tour orders. The applicant was initially ordered to extended active duty from 1 Oct 10 to 30 Sep 13. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00598
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The DOD Financial Management Regulation states those in the grades of O-1 to O-3 with more than 1,460 points as a warrant officer and/or enlisted member should receive credit for their service. AFI 36- 2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, states the request will be denied if the applicant has not exhausted all available and effective remedies. A complete copy of the A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03031
JA states that based on the facts presented in the NGB opinions, JA finds their responses to be legally sufficient and concurs with the recommendations to deny the applicant's requests for corrective action related to ACP payments, Board# V0611A, AGR separation from ANG Selective Retention Review Board (SRRB) consideration, and TERA. Counsels complete response is at Exhibit N. _______________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03725
However, no eligible RPA pilot will be able to take advantage of this due to the way one year orders are allocated and the delay in the release of the FY11 guidance. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his Air National Guard (ANG) FY11 ACP Program Announcement and Implementation Policy, aeronautical order, FY11 ACP Agreement Statement of Understanding (SOU), and other documents in support of his application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01410
Upon returning from his AD deployment in 2012 he was denied Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders and pay by his medical group, and he should have been considered for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). On 12 Dec 12, the Connecticut IG rendered a determination that the applicants contested injury was incurred while serving on AD, and, as he was found fit for duty, no MEDCON orders were warranted. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05576
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05576 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: As amended, his date of appointment into the Air National Guard (ANG) be changed from 17 Sep 12 to 1 Aug 12. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Air Force Recruiters failed to submit his AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04009
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04009 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of discharge on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 28 Feb 91. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her DD Form 214 reflects a discharge date of 31 May 88, but her Honorable discharge certificate from the Air National Guard reflects the correct date of 28 Feb 91. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02982
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02982 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His mobilization orders be extended beyond 17 Oct 13 to allow him to utilize all earned leave under Title 10 status. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03925
The Board should consider her untimely application in the interest of justice because her records were never evaluated for awards during the time of her deployment. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Feb 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief (Force...